> Nothing really prevents you from having a safe that after N failed attempts from destroying the contents with explosives. I would hope that a number of laws

> Nothing really prevents you from having a safe that after N failed attempts from destroying the contents with explosives. I would hope that a number of laws prohibit my carrying on my person a small safe filled with explosives and a known-effective trigger. Hypothetically, we could create such a safe. Practically, however, we could not create one that would be as easily and broadly used as an iPhone. Therefore, the nature of the social question presented by a perfectly secure (for all intents and purposes, or at least a future iteration that is) mass market device is fairly novel.