3 ms·
Serving static, stripped down HTML under 65ms is not that hard. You really don't need any AMP for this.
by pmlnr 11y ago
Serving static, stripped down HTML under 65ms is not that hard.
You really don't need any AMP for this.
- praseodym 11y agoThis is not about serving time but about browser loading time: getting the DOM ready (DOMContentReady) in 65ms.
- pmlnr 11y agoRight. I guess it's a good thing that with a static HTML it's basically the same thing but without the fancyness and the Google cache in the background.
- untog 11y agoThis is what bothers me about AMP. You don't need to load a Google JS library to get fast loading of static content.