You can think that. I disagree. That's fine. Good on you. And yes, I did mis-attribute some problems with Scheme's implementation of MVR to common lisp. Howeve

You can think that. I disagree. That's fine. Good on you. And yes, I did mis-attribute some problems with Scheme's implementation of MVR to common lisp. However, I admitted to the mistake in that thread, and eventually got the idea. So please, don't confuse the issue. Here, I'm not talking just about lisp. I just don't like MVR in general. And yes, I think that a composite value is the only good way to produce multiple values. But I don't have an objection to WASM adding MVR, because it's compiler facing, as you pointed out. I object to higher lever languages adding it.