Reminds me of the picture in this article: http://www.novolume.co.uk/blog/all-websites-look-the-same/ http://www.novolume.co.uk/blog/all-websites-look-the-same

Reminds me of the picture in this article: http://www.novolume.co.uk/blog/all-websites-look-the-same/ http://www.novolume.co.uk/blog/all-websites-look-the-same/ Except you know, this one has four columns rather than three. Really though, I think people are being a bit unfair on Bootstrap with these criticisms. I mean sure, it makes it easy to make yet another cookie cutter website with the same layout (as a lot of startups have found out), but you can also do some really impressive stuff with the framework if you think outside the box for half a second. And hey, this template does work for a fair few startups and 'service' companies. Not all of them, but a decent amount of the Silicon Valley type anyway. Why reinvent the wheel for yet another generic company that's probably not going to last six months?