4 ms·
NSQ and NATS are my goto tools for messaging, though NSQ seems more flexible to me because it supports message persistence and also provides NATS-like ephemeral
by deepanchor 11y ago
NSQ and NATS are my goto tools for messaging, though NSQ seems more flexible to me because it supports message persistence and also provides NATS-like ephemeral channels for when persistence is not a hard requirement. And it comes with a shiny admin-dashboard, which NATS lacks. NATS is useful when raw performance is a priority.
One thing I do find lacking in both of these queues is support for per-message TTL though, for pruning time sensitive messages. I'm not sure what the performance overhead would be for supporting something like that.