4 ms·
I agree with you. It's a pretty, modern looking template that suits a variety of products. Good design is hard, and good designers are expensive. Wouldn't you
by Niksko 11y ago
I agree with you. It's a pretty, modern looking template that suits a variety of products.
Good design is hard, and good designers are expensive. Wouldn't you rather have the default design be a good one, instead of paying shitty designers to make shitty designs and use that as the default look for the web?
- jredwards 11y agoThe last line is: "Honestly this template does look really nice, though."
- taneq 11y agoI'd rather the default design have some actual damn information rather than a few vague feelgood phrases and some unrelated stock photos. Bonus points if they don't make me watch a 5 minute video full of exciting music and artsy slow-mo footage of "cloth sliding off a thing" or "people laughing in a park" and still give me no idea what their stupid product actually does. I know this is a gripe about the content rather than the presentation, but seriously, so many websites based on this kind of template are a total waste of my time and attention.