3 ms·

I can understand the part on the "more beautiful" but I for the html part I suppose you don't have to deal everyday with things like : <div class="row">

by tangue 11y ago

I can understand the part on the "more beautiful" but I for the html part I suppose you don't have to deal everyday with things like : <div class="row"> <div class="col-lg-3"> <ul class="list-group">

MisterBastahrd 11y ago
I do. And I still prefer it over the alternative.
foota 11y ago
I fail to see the issue here?
- beeboop 11y ago
  Same, this is a million times more legible than the HTML Google Material Design uses.
- tn13 11y ago
  Exactly! Those three lines of Bootstrap HTML tells me lot more than any other three lines of a non bootstrap site.
CM30 11y ago
You can always replace the divs with more semantic markup, just with the Bootstrap classes attached. I mean, using a main element for the container, a div for the row, then an article and various aside elements for the columns (depending on the layout and structure) will at least make the source code somewhat easier to parse.