Thanks for the response! I'm not familiar with Vancouver -- is this what you're describing? https://www.google.com/maps/@49.2821477,-123.1245358,3a,75y,273.81h

Thanks for the response! I'm not familiar with Vancouver -- is this what you're describing? https://www.google.com/maps/@49.2821477,-123.1245358,3a,75y,273.81h,118.78t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sjS1C9OGjlNdu53U9y0hhVw!2e0!7i13312!8i6656 https://www.google.com/maps/@49.2821477,-123.1245358,3a,75y,... If so I think we largely agree on SF's ideal future, and differ only in how to manage the politics and our understanding of the extent to which low- and mid-rise development would benefit SF.