3 ms·
I noticed the same thing, and my guess is that the WSJ is generally dismissive of climate change risk, and against government incentives to combat climate chang
by hmahncke 11y ago
I noticed the same thing, and my guess is that the WSJ is generally dismissive of climate change risk, and against government incentives to combat climate change, and wanted to frame this article as what the government should be doing instead of encouraging hybrid/electric vehicles.
- MattHeard 11y agoFrom the article: > After a decade of spending much of its time and billions focused on boosting fuel-efficiency, Washington is increasing its focus on technology that could save lives. This ignores that one of the justifications for fuel-efficiency regulation is the lives saved from reduced pollution.
- mikeash 11y agoAnd it's not like Washington has stopped its drive towards greater fuel efficiency either. What a weird attempted connection!