I had to count carefully, but it appears you're claiming 12 9's of durability for magic pocket, which seems like a subtle jab at S3's 11 9's. I think both dura

I had to count carefully, but it appears you're claiming 12 9's of durability for magic pocket, which seems like a subtle jab at S3's 11 9's. I think both durability numbers would be fine for customers, but I've also wondered about the math behind AWS S3 durability for a while, and how you would prove statistically that 11 9's was even possible.