3 ms·
Unbreakable encryption exists. Trying to legislate it away is like trying to stuff the genie back in the bottle. There is no way to prevent "bad guys" from wri
by dmbaggett 11y ago
Unbreakable encryption exists. Trying to legislate it away is like trying to stuff the genie back in the bottle.
There is no way to prevent "bad guys" from writing encryption software and installing it on programmable devices; you can find the code for AES in under one minute, written for any language you desire. It takes an undergrad level of programming ability to create a functioning app that does basic AES encryption. So ISIS just needs one programmer with this ability -- and somehow I doubt that person is going to give a copy of the master private key to law enforcement.
To the extent that governments prevent unfettered use of encryption in mainstream devices, "bad guys" will just use rasbperry pi's, custom ASICs they get fabricated, etc. Programmable devices capable of running strong ciphers and communicating over the internet are absurdly cheap now.
Limiting the use of cryptography would therefore only harm stupid and non-resourceful criminals, and regular people with something to hide. Which is everyone, kind of.
- ScottBurson 11y agoI think this is the operative point. Even if we agreed on some key escrow system and mandated its use on common devices, that would just make strong crypto somewhat harder to get. You can bet a thriving black market would spring up in no time to serve the need. The choice is not between a world where bad actors can communicate securely and one where they can't. The choice is between a world where everyone can communicate securely and one where only criminals can do so. "If strong crypto is outlawed, only outlaws will have strong crypto", one might say.