5 ms·

Greece Can Default & It Will be Fine, but the US & Britain are Really Screwed

31 points by jboydyhacker 17y ago

bd_at_rivenhill 17y ago
The quoted polemic, supposedly written by a Greek banker, doesn't make much sense. It starts off by describing Greeks as some of the world's richest people, then it claims that France and Germany are the problem (because their investment industry was looking for higher returns) and not Greece (which only took the money and misused it), and finally rejects the notion that Greeks will accept austerity because the money was actually stolen by the oligarchy that controls Greek businesses. If Greeks are so wealthy then they must certainly be able to solve the problem by increasing taxes and seriously pursuing evasion while cutting the bloated public sector. The actual fact is that the Greek government and large international banks have basically conspired to steal money from French and German taxpayers, and the average Greek on the street has joined the conspiracy by refusing to accept that the promises made to them by their government in terms of benefits and services were simply a fabrication that had no basis in reality.
- _delirium 17y ago
  They are making some attempts along those lines, which is interesting for a socialist government. There's a public-sector wage freeze, and significantly stepped-up attempts to go after tax evasion. Fun fact: in 2008, the average Greek doctor reported less than €10,000 in income. If you were to make a demographic map of Athens based on official income data from tax returns, most of the wealthy suburbs would look like ghettos.
- houseabsolute 17y ago
  Hmm, except the oligarchy aspect at the end, I thought the analysis was cogent enough. I liked his points about the bailouts being a wealth transfer to baby boomers in particular. It basically boils down to a few claims. For why Greece is not the loser: * A decrease in the amount our government is able to borrow will not hurt us very much. (This jives with your claim that Greece squandered the money lent to them.) * Investors have short memories. They'll be knocking at our door again soon enough. For why either baby boomers or the current generation do stand to lose: * Bailouts represent a wealth transfer from the current generation, who will pay for them over time in taxes, to the baby boomers, whose investments are the ones being bailed out. I'm not sure if his claims were about who was the problem so much as a pragmatic analysis of who stands to lose. I've always thought that when bankruptcy and default are options, the debtor is in fact the one that holds the power in the lender-lendee relationship, and this situation seems to lend credence to that view.
rabidsnail 17y ago
Lumping the US and UK together in the context of debt/gdp is misleading. The UK does, as the article suggests, have a nearly 400% debt/gdp ratio, but the US is "only" 95% debt/gdp.
- ahi 17y ago
  I think, but don't know, that that 95% is federal only. Load in state and local governments and the US might be competitive with the UK.
  - ovi256 17y ago
    Plus the Medicare and Social security financing debt, which, in a beautiful coup of financial engineering, is counted separately.
  - btilly 17y ago
    The biggest component to US debt is private. Let me find some figures. Googling for us "total debt" private leads me to http://mwhodges.home.att.net/nat-debt/debt-nat.htm http://mwhodges.home.att.net/nat-debt/debt-nat.htm which claims a total US debt of $57 trillion. The site is sensationalistic, but I have no reason to doubt their numbers. Almost certainly they are going off of recognized published numbers from somewhere. That figure includes "all recognized debt of federal, state & local governments, international, private households, business and domestic financial sectors, including federal debt to trust funds". It does NOT include unfunded obligations like pensions and social security. Wikipedia tells me that the US GDP is 14.2 trillion. Dividing one number into the other gives me a 401.4% debt/GDP level for the USA. And since we only have the first number to 2 significant digits, we should round that to 400%. Whether or not you agree with the conclusions in the email, the numbers quoted look accurate.
- adamt 17y ago
  Uk government debt as a proportion if GDP is more like 55% http://www.statistics.gov.uk/cci/nugget.asp?ID=277 http://www.statistics.gov.uk/cci/nugget.asp?ID=277 The author if the original piece seems to have several key stats wrong which undermines his arguments.
sdurkin 17y ago
China, Spain, Portugal, France, Great Britain, the Ottoman Empire, and Argentina all defaulted on their debt. Some of those nations were Great Powers at the time of their default. If the United States defaults, it will lead to breadlines, but not to Armageddon. In conclusion, calm down. Stop reading every blog post on the national debt. Stop pulling up every tired Mad Max reference you can muster. And certainly stop telling your neighbors to hide gold under their floor boards. Your company might not be here in a few years, but the United States and the global economy probably will.
- akadien 17y ago
  Very good advice. I started a social blog this weekend (www.financialpreparedness.com) to spread the notion that, while it's not a bad idea to prepare, the world is not going to end.
miked 17y ago
The goings on in America, where nobody is thankful for having been "saved" and where the economy is suffering the result of a misguided, short-term decision may push the French and German government to say "the Greeks don't deserve a bailout..." So, a decision local to the US will push the French and German govs to withhold a bailout to Greece??? Also, the article never gives any numbers for Greek government debt held by the US or UK. All this, plus some bad numbers (see the post's comments) make me dismiss most of this.
mark_l_watson 17y ago
If you read the Blogspot profile of the author of this article, it looks like he lives in the USA. That said, he makes good points. I agree that the UK and USA are face the worse economic problems, but it may take several years. Here in the USA, our leaders will do anything to push problems into the future rather than working on them.

31 points by jboydyhacker 17y ago

The quoted polemic, supposedly written by a Greek banker, doesn't make much sense. It starts off by describing Greeks as some of the world's richest people, then it claims that France and Germany are the problem (because their investment industry was looking for higher returns) and not Greece (which only took the money and misused it), and finally rejects the notion that Greeks will accept austerity because the money was actually stolen by the oligarchy that controls Greek businesses. If Greeks are so wealthy then they must certainly be able to solve the problem by increasing taxes and seriously pursuing evasion while cutting the bloated public sector. The actual fact is that the Greek government and large international banks have basically conspired to steal money from French and German taxpayers, and the average Greek on the street has joined the conspiracy by refusing to accept that the promises made to them by their government in terms of benefits and services were simply a fabrication that had no basis in reality.

_delirium 17y ago
They are making some attempts along those lines, which is interesting for a socialist government. There's a public-sector wage freeze, and significantly stepped-up attempts to go after tax evasion. Fun fact: in 2008, the average Greek doctor reported less than €10,000 in income. If you were to make a demographic map of Athens based on official income data from tax returns, most of the wealthy suburbs would look like ghettos.
houseabsolute 17y ago
Hmm, except the oligarchy aspect at the end, I thought the analysis was cogent enough. I liked his points about the bailouts being a wealth transfer to baby boomers in particular. It basically boils down to a few claims. For why Greece is not the loser: * A decrease in the amount our government is able to borrow will not hurt us very much. (This jives with your claim that Greece squandered the money lent to them.) * Investors have short memories. They'll be knocking at our door again soon enough. For why either baby boomers or the current generation do stand to lose: * Bailouts represent a wealth transfer from the current generation, who will pay for them over time in taxes, to the baby boomers, whose investments are the ones being bailed out. I'm not sure if his claims were about who was the problem so much as a pragmatic analysis of who stands to lose. I've always thought that when bankruptcy and default are options, the debtor is in fact the one that holds the power in the lender-lendee relationship, and this situation seems to lend credence to that view.

rabidsnail 17y ago

Lumping the US and UK together in the context of debt/gdp is misleading. The UK does, as the article suggests, have a nearly 400% debt/gdp ratio, but the US is "only" 95% debt/gdp.

ahi 17y ago
I think, but don't know, that that 95% is federal only. Load in state and local governments and the US might be competitive with the UK.
- ovi256 17y ago
  Plus the Medicare and Social security financing debt, which, in a beautiful coup of financial engineering, is counted separately.
- btilly 17y ago
  The biggest component to US debt is private. Let me find some figures. Googling for us "total debt" private leads me to http://mwhodges.home.att.net/nat-debt/debt-nat.htm http://mwhodges.home.att.net/nat-debt/debt-nat.htm which claims a total US debt of $57 trillion. The site is sensationalistic, but I have no reason to doubt their numbers. Almost certainly they are going off of recognized published numbers from somewhere. That figure includes "all recognized debt of federal, state & local governments, international, private households, business and domestic financial sectors, including federal debt to trust funds". It does NOT include unfunded obligations like pensions and social security. Wikipedia tells me that the US GDP is 14.2 trillion. Dividing one number into the other gives me a 401.4% debt/GDP level for the USA. And since we only have the first number to 2 significant digits, we should round that to 400%. Whether or not you agree with the conclusions in the email, the numbers quoted look accurate.
adamt 17y ago
Uk government debt as a proportion if GDP is more like 55% http://www.statistics.gov.uk/cci/nugget.asp?ID=277 http://www.statistics.gov.uk/cci/nugget.asp?ID=277 The author if the original piece seems to have several key stats wrong which undermines his arguments.

sdurkin 17y ago

China, Spain, Portugal, France, Great Britain, the Ottoman Empire, and Argentina all defaulted on their debt. Some of those nations were Great Powers at the time of their default. If the United States defaults, it will lead to breadlines, but not to Armageddon. In conclusion, calm down. Stop reading every blog post on the national debt. Stop pulling up every tired Mad Max reference you can muster. And certainly stop telling your neighbors to hide gold under their floor boards. Your company might not be here in a few years, but the United States and the global economy probably will.

akadien 17y ago
Very good advice. I started a social blog this weekend (www.financialpreparedness.com) to spread the notion that, while it's not a bad idea to prepare, the world is not going to end.

miked 17y ago

The goings on in America, where nobody is thankful for having been "saved" and where the economy is suffering the result of a misguided, short-term decision may push the French and German government to say "the Greeks don't deserve a bailout..." So, a decision local to the US will push the French and German govs to withhold a bailout to Greece??? Also, the article never gives any numbers for Greek government debt held by the US or UK. All this, plus some bad numbers (see the post's comments) make me dismiss most of this.

mark_l_watson 17y ago

If you read the Blogspot profile of the author of this article, it looks like he lives in the USA. That said, he makes good points. I agree that the UK and USA are face the worse economic problems, but it may take several years. Here in the USA, our leaders will do anything to push problems into the future rather than working on them.