3 ms·
Many probiotics are labeled as "active". I think this means they are dead but the remaining proteins are "active". They'll only last as long as proteins a
by sbierwagen 11y ago
Many probiotics are labeled as "active". I think this
means they are dead but the remaining proteins are
"active". They'll only last as long as proteins are
available.
Incorrect. Probiotics are supposed to contain live, active bacteria: the large "CFU" number on the front stands for "colony forming unit": https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Colony-forming_unit https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Colony-forming_unit
Labdoor (which is advertising-supported) tests probiotics based on how accurate their CFU numbers are: https://labdoor.com/rankings/probiotics https://labdoor.com/rankings/probiotics (These tests, of course, don't say if the probiotic in question is actually good for you or not.)
I've taken both General Biotics Equilibrium and (115 strains, 1 billion CFUs, shipped unrefrigerated) and Renew Life Ultimate Flora Extra Care. (10 strains, 50 billion CFUs, refrigerated)
If either of them had any effect at all, I didn't notice it.
- tosseraccount 11y agoThanks for the clarification and the link. Not surprising to see Ultimate Flora at the top. I'd bet that a lot of these species die on the shelf. The industry might still benefit from consistently labeling as "live" on the bottle if the probiotics are live. I suspect that not everyone has an imbalance that would benefit the user. A good strategy might be to try various species until something works. An over the counter "23 and me" for gut species genomes assays might help; but that's a few years away.
- sbierwagen 11y agoAn over the counter "23 and me" for gut species genomes assays might help; but that's a few years away. Nope, here today. http://ubiome.com/ http://ubiome.com/ Costs $89.
- tosseraccount 11y agoAgain. Thanks. Anybody tried this?
- derekja 11y agoyup, not a bad report. I've used American Gut as well, a project from the University of Colorado at Boulder. Concordance between the two results was decent. I'm not sure I got a lot of actionable information from either, though. Certainly not as much of detailed interest as from the 23andme data.