> from a game theory perspective [...] expect 'rational' actors IMO, the problem with taking a complex situation and reducing it to game theory is that you can

> from a game theory perspective [...] expect 'rational' actors IMO, the problem with taking a complex situation and reducing it to game theory is that you can miss some of the nuance and end up with binary results that don't fully agree with the mushy reality of human society. It's useful for constrained scenarios. Perhaps if you were dealing with a purely psychopathic, transaction-focused population it would be suitable. > You're basically saying people should push any system as far as they can before the system pushes back. Not at all - perhaps what's ultimately learned is that better conditions should be provided to all students. Just as we might want basic care extended for all persons, rich and poor, rather than means testing it. That way security is baked right in, everybody benefits, and there's less administrative process.