I think in that way it would make sense to say that procedural is also prefix, then, since even very procedural languages like C use VSO. Some OOP languages use

I think in that way it would make sense to say that procedural is also prefix, then, since even very procedural languages like C use VSO. Some OOP languages use VSO too (Perl's indirect object syntax, Common Lisp with CLOS, etc.) And someone could write all their Haskell as: 1 `elem` [1, 2, 3] is a common way of calling elem in Haskell, and many times functions are redefined as operators (such as <$> instead of fmap, that gets used a lot more often). I just think that any kind of split with syntax based on paradigm seems very artificial to make.