3 ms·
Yea that's a good point about just how much better (and...different) Kripkes work is than that which has been produced by the publish or perish academic system
by arstin 11y ago
Yea that's a good point about just how much better (and...different) Kripkes work is than that which has been produced by the publish or perish academic system in philosophy. As far as I can tell it's been utterly counter-productive.
In Kripkes favor I would also add that he was a great stylist, with warmth and humor and...flexibility of presentation. And that partly because of this NN and WRPL are perfect introductory philosophy texts for "generally educated" people. If I taught philosophy instead of working in tech, I'd probably help keep Kripkes legacy alive for that reason alone!
- simondedalus 11y agodefinitely. his warmth and humor are very much on display in "a puzzle about belief" as well: http://www.uvm.edu/~lderosse/courses/lang/Kripke%281979%29.pdf http://www.uvm.edu/~lderosse/courses/lang/Kripke%281979%29.p... (putnam is cited in this paper as well, by the by)