4 ms·
True, but parsing is still a facinating and active research subject. It should really be its own course, perhaps taught using Grune Jacobs [1] [1] http://www.s
by n00b101 11y ago
True, but parsing is still a facinating and active research subject. It should really be its own course, perhaps taught using Grune Jacobs [1]
[1] http://www.springer.com/fr/book/9780387202488 http://www.springer.com/fr/book/9780387202488
- agumonkey 11y agoand http://tratt.net/laurie/blog/entries/parsing_the_solved_problem_that_isnt http://tratt.net/laurie/blog/entries/parsing_the_solved_prob...
- groovy2shoes 11y agoand http://matt.might.net/articles/parsing-with-derivatives/ http://matt.might.net/articles/parsing-with-derivatives/
- agumonkey 11y agoI forgot how beautiful this was.
- nickpsecurity 11y agoThat's true. There continues to be interesting work there. Most people dont want to improve parsers though. They just want to translate one programming language to another form. So, our focus should be on that stuff by default instead of the part that is mostly solved for most usecases even with automated tools.