> No security company that allowed its employees to pepper-spray nonviolent people on public walkways --- or, really, anywhere --- could long remain in business

> No security company that allowed its employees to pepper-spray nonviolent people on public walkways --- or, really, anywhere --- could long remain in business. What evidence leads you to this conclusion? Can you recall an instance in the US in which any company or any public agency was shut down or even dramatically reformed for abusing non-violent homeless people?