4 ms·
I agree with this. I've always wanted to use an FPGA for something cool, but never found a need. (I'm a hobbyist, fwiw). They fall in a middle ground between t
by sago 11y ago
I agree with this. I've always wanted to use an FPGA for something cool, but never found a need. (I'm a hobbyist, fwiw).
They fall in a middle ground between things I can build more simply with a super cheap microcontroller (I buy Arduino nanos for $2, for example), and things I really need GPU compute for. So I'm stuck. I keep thinking I'll do a DSP project soon, but that's more because it is one of the few things I think an FPGA will be useful for, than because I need it.
So cool, yes. Practical, maybe - but not very, at least for me.
- agumonkey 11y agoBunnie Huang (Novena laptop) talks mention how they reverse engineered ISA by MitM the CPU through the FPGA on the Novena's board. That's as cool as epic.
- nickpsecurity 11y agoThat is pretty epic
- iheartmemcache 11y agoHe did it in a hotel room in a foreign country. He, Tarnovsky, Nohl and Goodspeed just blow my mind. Things like the ZINC by Xilinx are working its way into things like the Red Pitaya[1] which is absolutely remarkably capable for the price range, but yeah FPGA's are pretty niche for the common end-user. Lithography on sil wafers ends up being cheaper at nearly any scale. It turns out more economical just to do that one of those cheap FPGA-to-ASIC conversion dealies (rather than using Cadence or whatever VLSI tooling you have to DFM from the start [I think UC Berkeley has a full architecture/RTL/logic/circuit/physical kit]) at the threshold of around a few thousand units. [1] http://store.redpitaya.com/red-pitaya-board-36.html http://store.redpitaya.com/red-pitaya-board-36.html