The problem isn't pushing an agenda (which I think everyone agrees is fine), it's adding something subjective with no legal definition to your license. Since n

The problem isn't pushing an agenda (which I think everyone agrees is fine), it's adding something subjective with no legal definition to your license. Since no one can say objectively "we do good", you're banking on not getting sued or having enough money and time to defend the lawsuit, which makes it unpalatable to many people. Additionally, it makes it non-free software, by definition, so a lot of distros can't include it or anything that depends on it.