3 ms·
I'm torn on this. On one hand the sort of multiple version support offered by OSGi can be very useful, but equally debugging and coverage tools can quickly beco
by aardvark179 11y ago
I'm torn on this. On one hand the sort of multiple version support offered by OSGi can be very useful, but equally debugging and coverage tools can quickly become confused because they may not cope well with multiple classes with identical names, and that ignores the fun of conflicting native libraries.
So for the first version I'd be happy to see this left to frameworks sitting above the module system, but I can appreciate other view points.