By inserting the term 'journalistic', you're refuting an argument I didn't make. I know net neutrality is not about being able to say what you want about politi

By inserting the term 'journalistic', you're refuting an argument I didn't make. I know net neutrality is not about being able to say what you want about political issues -- it's about whether a network is owned by the people who built it or the people who create content on it -- and the content guys have convinced you that it's some kind of moral struggle. Just reread the wiki article without reference to medium, and then explain to me why I should be allowed to purchase a pen and piece of paper, given that my ownership of a medium of communication would allow me to control what content is placed on that means of communication. It's a difference of degree, not kind.