> it looks to be a bit less one sided Yeah, it looks that way but where is the substance? Why doesn't he openly discuss the pros and cons of both sides to fin

> it looks to be a bit less one sided Yeah, it looks that way but where is the substance? Why doesn't he openly discuss the pros and cons of both sides to finally reach a conclusion? "But the dangers are real." is not a rational balancing of reasons. It is just a paranoid statement.