4 ms·

> They are incorrect. Building luxury housing will take some of the demand pressure off of non-luxury housing (which constitutes the vast majority of the housin

> They are incorrect. Building luxury housing will take some of the demand pressure off of non-luxury housing (which constitutes the vast majority of the housing in San Francisco), thereby lowering its price. Agreed. Also, rich people can just buy an old Victorian and modernize the inside, converting a non-luxury housing unit into a luxury one. That's one less unit on the market for normal people to buy or rent. For example: http://sf.curbed.com/2015/10/8/9913302/victorian-disemboweled-by-flippers-takes-a-big-700k-chop http://sf.curbed.com/2015/10/8/9913302/victorian-disembowele... This is what happens when you don't allow development to proceed. It only makes things worse. Rich people will get their luxury housing, one way or another. The rest of us are left with fewer options.

crzwdjk 11y ago
> Also, rich people can just buy an old Victorian and modernize the inside, converting a non-luxury housing unit into a luxury one. Oh, it's worse than that: they can buy an old Victorian full of apartments and convert several non-luxury housing units into a single luxury housing unit. Which is something that tends to be generally encouraged by the zoning and planning codes, because single family houses are regulated much less strictly than any other kind of building, and also tend to be exempt from things like rent control.