2 ms·
No it doesn't. It points to only two factors, and clearly implies that zoning (the decisions of "the old wealthy") was the more important of the two. As if de
by kafkaesq 11y ago
No it doesn't.
It points to only two factors, and clearly implies that zoning (the decisions of "the old wealthy") was the more important of the two.
As if decades of voting patterns in this (once) famously and beautifully economically diverse city might not have also had something to do with it.