While I agree with you I feel like that's a technical problem - if you want to argue from that position it should be a question of "how do we keep them in capti

While I agree with you I feel like that's a technical problem - if you want to argue from that position it should be a question of "how do we keep them in captivity efficiently/safely" both for them and humans rather than "should we keep them" and phrasing it as a moral question. Also the article's point and general theme seems kind of weak : >In line with this, several decades of observation show that orcas are not naturally violent towards humans. There are no recorded cases of a wild orca killing a human. This implies (and the surrounding text) - that this behavior is a result of captivity changing their behavior. How often do orcas and humans meet in a setting that would allow them to harm a human in a similar way they would - say a penguin ? Would it be plausible that they would do a similar thing in the wild in a similar setting given enough opportunities (since trainers interact with them constantly) ?