4 ms·
I'm not going to defend the design choices here but it performs fine on my four year old laptop running Firefox/Ubuntu, so it requires neither a very powerful h
by blfr 11y ago
I'm not going to defend the design choices here but it performs fine on my four year old laptop running Firefox/Ubuntu, so it requires neither a very powerful hardware, nor Chrome which is a more common failure mode.
- marcelluspye 11y agoI agree. Viewed it on a chromebook and the site performance was fine.
- 21 11y agoOn my very beefy computer, but with a 10 Mbps connection the experience is kind of shitty - it takes around half a second after a "scroll" for the content to appear.
- zxexz 11y agoIt runs fine on my "ancient" 2008 TP X200. The problem is the hijacking of scrolling, and the back button...
- nedwin 11y agoRuns like a bag of shit on my specced out Macbook Pro in Chrome.
- maccard 11y agoIt's sluggish on my desktop i7/970 combo.