3 ms·
OK, that is a pretty bad article, showing how little about Apple the writers know. They only touched tangentially on the Performa line; what made the Performa
by patrickgzill 17y ago
OK, that is a pretty bad article, showing how little about Apple the writers know.
They only touched tangentially on the Performa line; what made the Performa so horrendous, was that certain models were actually slower than the models they replaced. For example, the Performa 5200 had a crippled IDE bus, and the motherboard was based on a Quadra 605 board, giving the 75Mhz PPC 603 chip less performance than a PPC601 running at 88Mhz. See http://lowendmac.com/ppc/performa-5200.html http://lowendmac.com/ppc/performa-5200.html
- Poiesis 17y agoWow. This hadn't occurred to me before, but it also goes to show you how bad they were at naming. I mean, "Performa"? If that doesn't scream "budget line", I don't know what does.