According to the article it was a picture in two british newspapers. Hardly a basis to claim all skeptics are doing this. In fact the claim makes the exact same

According to the article it was a picture in two british newspapers. Hardly a basis to claim all skeptics are doing this. In fact the claim makes the exact same errors the newspapers did: looking at data out of context. It's two newspapers in the UK that could very possibly be using a single reporter's work and reviewed by editors that don't understand proper research. It's happened before at many other newspapers.