5 ms·

This project is amazing. The site's scrolling should be memorialized in a museum of awful user experiences for posterity's sake.

kanche 11y ago
Does anyone really like this kind of scrolljacking pages? Not responding properly on an MBP 2015. The project looks so interesting that I tortured myself by scrolling till the end. To me it feels similar to invasion of space.
- taylorwc 11y ago
  I couldn't agree more. I'm constantly surprised by the number of people that implement it.
- zzleeper 11y ago
  Not working on Win10 with latest Chrome either. Clicks ("Next Observation") take me down and then up where I was; then scrolling is jumpy and extremely annoying to read
- rhizome 11y ago
  Doesn't Google hire the best of the best?
- gkya 11y ago
  > Does anyone really like this kind of scrolljacking pages? Web devs. I guess it's like an accomplishment for them to create sth. like this (tho I didn't see it, just what I saw from the comments, if it's laggy on a recent macbook, I don't bother). In this context I think it is a bit like high-fructose corn syrup: The whole thing seems superfluous, what would I be able to do if I could watch a volcano eruption? Throw water from a plane? Tweet #stoplavaviolence? What benefit would I, or any construction companies would have from watching that particular gold mine? If I have a business there, I'd probably know what's going on, and I'd try to make acquaintances to get information directly, instead of trying to get it out of some pixels. If a video from high up was needed for an humanitarian situation, a helicopter can go up and take the video. All this stupidity should be marketed, and the website is the confectioner's sugar for the crap called Terra Bella. Terra bella, coeptum superfluus.
S4M 11y ago
Yep, it's a very ambitious project, but the scrolling is utterly broken for me (firefox 43.0 on Debian), and seeing from other comments, I'm not the only one. Wonder how someone can possibly ship a website where the scrolling is so broken.
- subie 11y ago
  Looks wonderful in chrome.
  - egeozcan 11y ago
    Chrome 48, Windows 10. I actually opened the task manager to see if some bg process was torturing the CPU after trying to scroll.
  - degenerate 11y ago
    Looks wonderful, perhaps, but plays wonderful it does not. There must have been 12 history items added to my back button before I was able to "scroll" down even a fraction of the page...
- ocdtrekkie 11y ago
  If you saw the launch of YouTube Gaming as well, or how the old version of Google+ ran on not-Chrome, you'd have long reached the conclusion that nobody at Google tests on non-Google web browsers. My understanding is they like using 'web technologies' that they invented that either aren't implemented or well-supported in any browser but their own.
RGamma 11y ago
It gets worse if you browse the web with zoom. At 125% zoom scrolling gets stuck on the third stage for me and imagery is consistently cut off. If you then use the scroll bar all bets are off, and the site very slowly stutters from one random place to the next (not to mention, that there's zero thought put into a graceful fallback when JS is disabled, although with e.g. lynx you at least get to see the site's text instead of just the loading icon).
deleted 11y ago
[deleted]

kanche 11y ago

Does anyone really like this kind of scrolljacking pages? Not responding properly on an MBP 2015. The project looks so interesting that I tortured myself by scrolling till the end. To me it feels similar to invasion of space.

taylorwc 11y ago
I couldn't agree more. I'm constantly surprised by the number of people that implement it.
zzleeper 11y ago
Not working on Win10 with latest Chrome either. Clicks ("Next Observation") take me down and then up where I was; then scrolling is jumpy and extremely annoying to read
rhizome 11y ago
Doesn't Google hire the best of the best?
gkya 11y ago
> Does anyone really like this kind of scrolljacking pages? Web devs. I guess it's like an accomplishment for them to create sth. like this (tho I didn't see it, just what I saw from the comments, if it's laggy on a recent macbook, I don't bother). In this context I think it is a bit like high-fructose corn syrup: The whole thing seems superfluous, what would I be able to do if I could watch a volcano eruption? Throw water from a plane? Tweet #stoplavaviolence? What benefit would I, or any construction companies would have from watching that particular gold mine? If I have a business there, I'd probably know what's going on, and I'd try to make acquaintances to get information directly, instead of trying to get it out of some pixels. If a video from high up was needed for an humanitarian situation, a helicopter can go up and take the video. All this stupidity should be marketed, and the website is the confectioner's sugar for the crap called Terra Bella. Terra bella, coeptum superfluus.

S4M 11y ago

Yep, it's a very ambitious project, but the scrolling is utterly broken for me (firefox 43.0 on Debian), and seeing from other comments, I'm not the only one. Wonder how someone can possibly ship a website where the scrolling is so broken.

subie 11y ago
Looks wonderful in chrome.
- egeozcan 11y ago
  Chrome 48, Windows 10. I actually opened the task manager to see if some bg process was torturing the CPU after trying to scroll.
- degenerate 11y ago
  Looks wonderful, perhaps, but plays wonderful it does not. There must have been 12 history items added to my back button before I was able to "scroll" down even a fraction of the page...
ocdtrekkie 11y ago
If you saw the launch of YouTube Gaming as well, or how the old version of Google+ ran on not-Chrome, you'd have long reached the conclusion that nobody at Google tests on non-Google web browsers. My understanding is they like using 'web technologies' that they invented that either aren't implemented or well-supported in any browser but their own.

RGamma 11y ago

It gets worse if you browse the web with zoom. At 125% zoom scrolling gets stuck on the third stage for me and imagery is consistently cut off. If you then use the scroll bar all bets are off, and the site very slowly stutters from one random place to the next (not to mention, that there's zero thought put into a graceful fallback when JS is disabled, although with e.g. lynx you at least get to see the site's text instead of just the loading icon).

deleted 11y ago

[deleted]