3 ms·
> Except some hosts told me that Booking.com is a rip off, plus it doesn't handle their accounting like Airbnb does. Well, Booking.com (or any other similar si
by eveningcoffee 11y ago
> Except some hosts told me that Booking.com is a rip off, plus it doesn't handle their accounting like Airbnb does.
Well, Booking.com (or any other similar site) offers hosts the reach they may otherwise miss.
It is also good if there are many such sites hosts could use as it would then presumably make situation more favorable for them. This is also why I mentioned Booking.com at all, as I do not see and I do not want to see the world in black/white (airbnb/hotel).
Having competition also (usually) helps to keep things more honest.
> From the user's point of view, Booking.com is a horrible cluttered web site with 1990'ish approaches to design, usability and online marketing.
I actually do not mind their design approach.
It is actually quite usable, even better as airbnb as they show the total amount upfront for the search period and not just the pay for a night in what, to be honest, I have no interest in. There are many other small differences that make Booking.com interface more usable for me.
Of course it comes down to personal preferences and this is only my personal opinion.
- saiya-jin 11y agoAs a beginner host I can tell you, booking.com IS a ripoff. They charge several times more than airbnb (15%), so hosts reflect this to higher price. So far I haven't seen the option to actually send the money to me, it seems I have to collect it on spot (hopefully not). I am 3 weeks into account opening process with them, and it's not yet done (because they fail to send me a mail with which I confirm whatever - this is internet company in 2016!). Airbnb was done in 15 minutes in super-intuitive manner. They deserve competition desperately, either improve or die. The only reason why it's still in existence is they were first, any many people are used to them. But as with all internet technologies, this will change over time.