> Apple doesn't have to be a ring leader to be legally responsible for their actions It does make a difference in the ruling and applied punishment. The 7th c

> Apple doesn't have to be a ring leader to be legally responsible for their actions It does make a difference in the ruling and applied punishment. The 7th circuit's decision from Toys R Us vs. FTC decision states, As TRU correctly points out, the critical question here is whether substantial evidence supported the Commission's finding that there was a horizontal agreement among the toy manufacturers, with TRU in the center as the ringmaster, to boycott the warehouse clubs. [1] The Toys R Us ruling was referenced in the 2nd circuit court of appeals ruling against Apple. Therefore, the above statement has bearing and Apple did need to be perceived as the ringleader to receive the brunt of the punishment. > So please, respond as you like. But I'm filtering out your posts from now on. You're the exact kind of person I shouldn't engage with on HN. That's your choice. I think I've been cordial. Feel free to point out anywhere I haven't been respectful. If disagreement is disrespectful to you, I don't know how else I can help. [1] http://antitru.st/toys-r-us/ http://antitru.st/toys-r-us/