3 ms·
$450 is still pretty expensive for something that doesn't really rate against an iPad :/
by mmanfrin 11y ago
$450 is still pretty expensive for something that doesn't really rate against an iPad :/
- smt88 11y agoReality (and sales figures) disagree with you: http://www.statista.com/statistics/276635/market-share-held-by-tablet-vendors/ http://www.statista.com/statistics/276635/market-share-held-... (I personally dislike tablets as a form factor and have both an iPad and Android tablet gathering dust, but people do seem to keep buying Android tablets.)
- berntb 11y agoHow large part of the Androids sold today are anywhere high end, with an acceptable screen? Is there a good selection of software these days which works well on a larger screen for Android? (I'm a staunch iOS user, waiting for an Ubuntu tablet with Emacs and Bash. How is the Linux support for the Surface?) Edit: To answer the brother comment from Galago, I mainly want a full size tablet for PDFs with A4 sized documents. Otherwise I could use a phablet phone.
- galago 11y agoYour link doesn't imply that. It suggests that "other" is the category replacing iOS in the market, which are no-name brands. Its not a trend where consumers are paying $450 for a Google product, but one where they're paying $200 for something generic. Amazon and the other players are just holding their ground. On the Apple side, I know people who bought the larger iPhone no longer felt a need for an iPad. I'm sure the same trend is true for Android, so its unclear who exactly is still buying tablets. Could it be people in markets/demographics where they can't get/afford full-featured phones?