3 ms·

What's wrong with the their election coverage (serious question)?

• kough 11y ago
  Severely biased in favor of Hillary. Makes sense – their main demographic is bankers, got to appease the customer. When he was in the race, they were hugely in favor of Jeb Bush, too. For instance, this [1] was on the front page of the website for at least a day. [1]: http://www.nytimes.com/2015/12/26/us/politics/hear-the-one-about-jeb-bushs-humor-you-have-to-listen-closely.html?_r=0 http://www.nytimes.com/2015/12/26/us/politics/hear-the-one-a...
• bmelton 11y ago
  Not OP, but as a paper & digital subscriber of the Washington Post (which I subscribed to for the Volokh Conspiracy, when they migrated), I have decided not to renew my subscription as I find the editorial board too opinionated. I have zero problems with op-ed pieces being opinionated, but when those opinions seep into the actual news, I have a hard time calling it journalism, and an even harder time giving them my money. That said, I can think of literally zero unbiased sources, especially as Circa's shut down. It doesn't seem to be a feature that many people are willing to pay for.