The approach taken to preserve backwards compatibility with existing code that already uses `var` as an identifier is interesting: "The identifier var will not

The approach taken to preserve backwards compatibility with existing code that already uses `var` as an identifier is interesting: "The identifier var will not be made into a keyword; instead it will be a reserved type name. This means that code that uses var as a variable, method, or package name will not be affected; code that uses var as a class or interface name will be affected (but these names violate the naming conventions.)" I didn't know there were such things as "reserved type names", but I'm guessing `var` will be treated sort of like `String` or `Object` (always available without an explicit import) and maybe it'll be a class in `java.lang`? Seems like a much "nicer" approach than when Enum types were introduced with the `enum` keyword, but I guess that was slightly different.