I will never get the Docker rant. At the beginning I loved it however the deeper I digged the more I hated it. Actually the only thing I need would be immutabl

I will never get the Docker rant. At the beginning I loved it however the deeper I digged the more I hated it. Actually the only thing I need would be immutable infrastructure and resource isolation. However for most of these things you don't need docker at all. You would've need some sort of container that could be fully isolated with the kernel cgroups and have somehow a way to isolate the network, but docker grows to a extremely fat monolithic approach where everything is put into and still it gets worse every release and the problems will never be fully addressed. And on top of that the Docker Inc. tries to monetize on that with software that other vendors could do as well. Docker Inc. should focus on Docker and not on everything surrounding that. Docker should've been easy, but now to make a good use of it your infrastructure will definitly not as easy as you planned at first. The way how you deploy software will change, but I doubt that it's docker who will make the "global" change. Maybe it was docker who gave a first impression how it could look but it's definitely not the end.