4 ms·
Well, I'm sorry that it does not look like you would want it to look like, but as a pypy dev this is not my battle - we're there to provide a fast version of th
by fijal 11y ago
Well, I'm sorry that it does not look like you would want it to look like, but as a pypy dev this is not my battle - we're there to provide a fast version of the mainstream python and mainstream for now means 2.7. If it changes, we'll adapt
- tokai 11y agoIsn't that change coming now? Most of the most popular libraries have python 3 support now, fedora will soon move to python 3 as default, and there are soon more developer support behind 3 than 2.[0] [0] https://blogs.msdn.microsoft.com/pythonengineering/2016/03/08/python-3-is-winning/ https://blogs.msdn.microsoft.com/pythonengineering/2016/03/0...
- mixmastamyk 11y agoIf you're not part of the solution, you're part of the precipitate.
- Sir_Cmpwn 11y agoIt really is your battle. Major Python projects not supporting Python 3 in 2016 is shameful and holds back the broader adoption of Python 3.
- jjawssd 11y agoYou can't blame someone you aren't paying for not implementing a feature you want.
- Sir_Cmpwn 11y agoThey are being paid. $63K, including by me. It's their most funded donation goal. https://sr.ht/qXYC.png https://sr.ht/qXYC.png
- ZenoArrow 11y ago> "They are being paid. $63K, including by me. It's their most funded donation goal." From a later comment by a dev... "We spent the py3k budget (almost all of it) on delivering pypy 3.2." Even the link you shared shows the pot is down to $8222. Hopefully that will increase, but I don't know what would be required to get support for later Python versions.
- fijal 11y agoWe spent the py3k budget (almost all of it) on delivering pypy 3.2. If someone is very unhappy that it was either too expensive or we didn't deliver enough for the money we received, I can apologize.
- Sir_Cmpwn 11y agoWould be nice if the numbers on the home page were more representative of the current situation, then.