4 ms·
> It could happen that the AI couldn't be able to go beyond a certain level. That's your wishful thinking. As we've seen the matches with Fan Hui in the past,
by devy 11y ago
> It could happen that the AI couldn't be able to go beyond a certain level.
That's your wishful thinking.
As we've seen the matches with Fan Hui in the past, unfortunately and fortunately, the CNN will improve drastically game after game and making less mistakes whereas human always do at a certain level.
Another big point I want to point out is human emotion and state of the mind. With 0:2, Lee Sedol lost his confidence ("speechless" in his own words) [1] and quite possibly increasing fear of losing in a landslide 0:5. Losing confidence and fear of losing are VERY TERRIBLE things in any
competitive sports.
[1] http://www.theverge.com/2016/3/10/11191184/lee-sedol-alphago-go-deepmind-google-match-2-result http://www.theverge.com/2016/3/10/11191184/lee-sedol-alphago...
- statsaresimple 11y agoit is very interesting to measure at what rate AI improves. If the AI can improve a lot, a very interesting problem is to develop a scale or elo for measuring this progress. I am more interested in what lesson we can take home from this match, I don't have a wish here. We have many thinks to learn about this. In a situation of great uncertainty about the pace at with AI can improve its capabilities, measuring the velocity or rate of change can gives a hint about the future and applications of this new technology.