> Butlerian-Jihad-like opposition to active content Genius line. Individuals are already trying to improve things within their own spheres, witness the static

> Butlerian-Jihad-like opposition to active content Genius line. Individuals are already trying to improve things within their own spheres, witness the static site movement. Many people using static sites are trying to output some form of "reduced HTML" (without popups etc.) but it's very informal. It would be nice if there was actually a RestrictedHTML document format they could target, if you're trying to start a movement it's important to have words for what you're doing. Note that while you'd be dropping huge amounts of features from the current HTML+CSS+JS stack, there are some features you'd want to add as well. For instance, the source of a webpage not being included with the page itself is not really optimal. (Think of how few pages are written in HTML directly -- they're written in Markdown on LaTeX or something else and then compiled to HTML). It would be nice to have native support for "ctrl+click on part of the HTML and then be taken to the original source".