3 ms·
Seriously guys. Downvotes for talking about digital physics? Sad me. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Superfluid_vacuum_theory#Relation_to_other_concepts_and_theo
by goldenkey 11y ago
Seriously guys. Downvotes for talking about digital physics? Sad me.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Superfluid_vacuum_theory#Relation_to_other_concepts_and_theories https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Superfluid_vacuum_theory#Relat...
"Relativistic quantum field theory"
- NoMoreNicksLeft 11y agoDownvotes for asking whether we're certain of some rather ignorant assumptions. -4 for me.
- goldenkey 11y agoUm, my first comment was just referring to the fact that in an absolutely framed turing-complete environment. One can sprout a quantum vacuum full of constant noise, ie. constant producing and annihilating structures(analagous to virtual particles.) This is already experimentally observed in our own universe. Quantum noise exists in vacuums. If you look at C in GoL as the fastest an actual black square can propagate, then of course you'll validate your naive assumptions that our universe could never be digitally replicated by GoL. But if you take the idea of implementing a primordial sea of quantum noise, and looking at the GoL board not as physical particles directly, but as a deeper construct. Then you can actually replicate relativity. http://arxiv.org/pdf/physics/9902034.pdf http://arxiv.org/pdf/physics/9902034.pdf