3 ms·
It's on, seriously. Challenge accepted. I think what Ke is underestimating however, is that the computer's learning rate is better than a humans. Even if the c
by dosaygo 11y ago
It's on, seriously. Challenge accepted.
I think what Ke is underestimating however, is that the computer's learning rate is better than a humans. Even if the computer is not in his game now, in a little while it will exceed him.
Only a matter of time, Ke. Accept it.
- swang 11y agoIf you had read the article Ke pretty much says this.
- dosaygo 11y agoAHAHAHAHA. "pretty much", "had read" -- so you can read what others are doing across time and space? Riiiight. Moron. Why would I listen to someone whose joy comes from telling other people they were wrong on the internet. SO meaningful. hahaha. This is worth revisiting -- like the absolute idiocy of someone who assumes that if another person, wholly unlike themselves, had read the same article, then they would reach the same conclusion. Group think loser. I mean, that's your assumption, right? Hahahah. Flubbing moron. Hahaha.
- meric 11y agoAre you OK? You seemed like a cool guy in the who's hiring comment but in this thread you sound nuts. Look for help if you need it.
- meric 11y ago??? "According to the pace of AI's progress, it won't be long for AlphaGo to beat all human players, it may happen a few years later, even a few months later," added Ke.
- dosaygo 11y ago??? And? So from your point of view you just proved someone wrong on the internet, well done. If Ke actually appreciated this, he'd see there was no point to playing a computer. But I don't expect you to understand that...because then you'd have nothing to say " you were wrong " about. Whatever. Idiot.
- meric 11y agoI play against the computer in a variety of games for fun, I'm sure Ke would play Go with one for pretty much the same reason.