3 ms·
I can't provide specific evidence for you to sue the US Govt over NAFTA, but your comment > Commerce has to cross the border for what you are saying to be true
by cariaso 11y ago
I can't provide specific evidence for you to sue the US Govt over NAFTA, but your comment
> Commerce has to cross the border for what you are saying to be true.
seems overly broad. I think there are established cases which disprove that. All it has to do is have an impact across the border, not necessarily trade across it.
http://law2.umkc.edu/faculty/projects/ftrials/conlaw/statecommerce.htm http://law2.umkc.edu/faculty/projects/ftrials/conlaw/stateco...
is full of interesting examples with
Hunt v Washington State Apple Ass'n (1977)
being one of many that seems relevant.
And
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gonzales_v._Raich https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gonzales_v._Raich
for an (arguably) purely domestic california marijuana law.
- fweespee_ch 11y agoThe topic is trade treaties, not the Commerce Clause. You seem lost on the context...the Commerce Clause isn't relevant to the impact of a trade treaty on domestic policy in regards to domestic companies.