3 ms·
Please provide evidence I can sue the US government as a purely domestic entity under NAFTA arbitration. Commerce has to cross the border for what you are sayi
by fweespee_ch 11y ago
Please provide evidence I can sue the US government as a purely domestic entity under NAFTA arbitration.
Commerce has to cross the border for what you are saying to be true.
- cariaso 11y agoI can't provide specific evidence for you to sue the US Govt over NAFTA, but your comment > Commerce has to cross the border for what you are saying to be true. seems overly broad. I think there are established cases which disprove that. All it has to do is have an impact across the border, not necessarily trade across it. http://law2.umkc.edu/faculty/projects/ftrials/conlaw/statecommerce.htm http://law2.umkc.edu/faculty/projects/ftrials/conlaw/stateco... is full of interesting examples with Hunt v Washington State Apple Ass'n (1977) being one of many that seems relevant. And https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gonzales_v._Raich https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gonzales_v._Raich for an (arguably) purely domestic california marijuana law.
- fweespee_ch 11y agoThe topic is trade treaties, not the Commerce Clause. You seem lost on the context...the Commerce Clause isn't relevant to the impact of a trade treaty on domestic policy in regards to domestic companies.