4 ms·
"Hillary and Trump have received the lion's share of attention in media, social media, and such. Google searches SHOULD show them prominently." I'm not sure I
by waterlesscloud 11y ago
"Hillary and Trump have received the lion's share of attention in media, social media, and such. Google searches SHOULD show them prominently."
I'm not sure I agree with this.
An alternative is easy to conceive, that all candidates that meet some external criteria (such as being on a ballot) are randomized to be favored equally in results.
I'm not convinced that it's inherently better to favor candidates with a lot of media coverage over just equally favoring them all. Sure, that's how it works now, but that doesn't mean it should be that way. There is a choice to make.
- manachar 11y agoGoogle tries to show what the web and web users think is relevant to a search term. Not what is true, neutral, peer-reviewed, curated, balanced, etc. It'd be interesting to see if Google could come up with a way to use machine learning to do fact finding and remove the web's biases. I strongly suspect such an effort would be seen as more dangerous than just reporting on the web.