4 ms·
I also vastly prefer R to Pandas, where the same functionality for plyr seems awfully verbose and unclear.
by marrone12 11y ago
I also vastly prefer R to Pandas, where the same functionality for plyr seems awfully verbose and unclear.
- eruditely 11y agoI definitely prefer R to pandas, dyplr and tools were soo much easier to use for subsetting dataframes and dealing with them, initially I thought python might be better because it was supposed to be easier, but boy was I wrong.
- pbowyer 11y agoThanks for mentioning dyplr. I've been struggling with pandas (can a library be more convoluted?) and will definitely give R a go.
- eruditely 11y agoYeah out all the assorted packages that go with that, tidyr too. Here's a cheat sheet https://www.rstudio.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/data-wrangling-cheatsheet.pdf https://www.rstudio.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/data-wran...