4 ms·
Complication #0 actually seems even worse when private insurance is tossed in to the mix: much of the monitoring that would be prudent is excluded by my employe
by facetube 11y ago
Complication #0 actually seems even worse when private insurance is tossed in to the mix: much of the monitoring that would be prudent is excluded by my employer-based insurance company as "not medically necessary". For example, I can't get them to pay for a CYP2D6 test to determine if I'm an ultrarapid metabolizer of a particular drug, nor can I get them to pay for blood level monitoring of the active metabolite to determine if I'm in the therapeutic range. In fact, tests across cytochrome P450 have a blanket exclusion. This is a $20,000 per year policy; probably the best the US health system has to offer.
- cat-dev-null 11y agoArgh, that's frustrating. Perhaps biohacker folks may work on how cheap the chems are for these sorts of tests "unapproved" DIY/out-of-pocket way to do it? This seems like a TED / TEDx speaker-worthy problem begging for a cheaper/easier solution.