3 ms·
This really isn't an accurate representation of what happened. WebKit's success didn't happen overnight, and people weren't jumping on it from the get-go. In fa
by Cwiiis 11y ago
This really isn't an accurate representation of what happened. WebKit's success didn't happen overnight, and people weren't jumping on it from the get-go. In fact, there was a long period of people using Gecko and engineering their own embedding/browser solutions because it was widely, and correctly realised that Gecko was a more mature and featureful engine. This was my job for several years before I was employed by Mozilla (and indeed, I did do some WebKit work at the time too - but there was far less demand for it).
It was only through a long period of neglecting these users that WebKit was allowed to mature and become successful. There was a good reason for doing this (see yoric's blog post, linked in my other comment above), but I think we've past the time now where we need to reconsider this direction somewhat.
- toyg 11y agoIt didn't happen overnight because any embedding project takes time; but the webkit community expanded relatively quickly as Mozilla simply did not care about their (overall small and shrinking) own share of the market. You said it yourself, they just did not care enough. Look at Qt, which had struggled for a while with producing reliable Gecko bindings and then really turned a corner with Webkit.