4 ms·
This is such a risky game to play. Yes, I took a similar approach to HS with similar results. But I remember competing with another student to see who could do
by ejk314 11y ago
This is such a risky game to play. Yes, I took a similar approach to HS with similar results. But I remember competing with another student to see who could do the best in a class without opening their book. I passed. I didn't do as well as I could have, but I passed. He wasn't so fortunate. By the time he accepted that he was behind, it was too late for him to save his grade. What I'm saying is, students should be taught which homework to do, not to just to skip it.
- xiaoma 11y agoGetting a bad grade doesn't sound nearly as big of a risk as wasting one's childhood and adolescence.
- JackFr 11y ago'Wasting' in the eye of the beholder.
- alistairSH 11y agoExcept in large American suburbs, college admissions has become so competitive that you need a near-perfect GPA (along with decent extra-curricular activities) to get accepted to the decent state schools. This wasn't the case 15-20 years ago. When I started college (1995), good (but not perfect) grades, with a compelling life-story, were good enough. These days, there are simply too many students applying to college - the bar is much higher, even for schools that were previously considered fall-backs (JMU, GMU, VCU in my state).
- riskable 11y agoThis presumes college is the goal or that graduating college is actually important. Also, what does getting into a "good college" actually provide (in terms of education--forget social networking for a moment) above and beyond a "mediocre college"? Everyone would have us believe that "an education is what you make of it" yet the foundation of our society is apparently the opposite: The education is what makes you.
- alistairSH 11y agoI don't disagree, but as long as getting into a good college is deemed important (rightly or wrongly), getting bad grades is risky.