> I don't see any problem with this, as an interviewer. The issue for the interviewer is missing out on good potential hires because your selection process is

> I don't see any problem with this, as an interviewer. The issue for the interviewer is missing out on good potential hires because your selection process is biased against people with little free time. I have a family and I'm doing part-time study in the evenings. If I'm looking for a new job, then I can probably find time for 1 exercise a fortnight. If one company tells me they have a "4 hour assignment" and the other a "1 hour", then I'm far more likely to do the 1 hour exercise and pass on the long one. And if I do the 1 hour test, I'd expect to be assessed accordingly. If you're comparing one person's output after 1 hour with another who actually spent 5 hours on it, then you will be more inclined to hire the person that spent longer on the project, even though that's not really going to corelate with on the job performance.