4 ms·
Well 1) it took us 5 years to get those features, 3.0 just broke shit and ran slowly for no discernible benefit to the end user. And 2) I know of no reason tho
by kec 11y ago
Well 1) it took us 5 years to get those features, 3.0 just broke shit and ran slowly for no discernible benefit to the end user.
And 2) I know of no reason those features couldn't be implemented in Python2 other than "we don't want to, because otherwise few people will ever upgrade to 3"
- rat87 11y agoWas upgrading even recommended before 3.3?
- kec 11y agoThat doesn't actually help the "py3k was a good idea" argument. 3.3 came out 4 years after 3.0. 4 years to become a reasonable choice is kind of pathetic, especially given the fact that python2 was put into bugfix-only mode 2 years after the 3.0 release